Qwen 3.5 dropped an hour ago. You want to run it. Here’s the TL;DR, then we’ll talk about why Alibaba just made a chess move in AI economics.

Quick Start (3 Steps)

1. Hardware Check

You need serious metal:

  • Minimum: 8× NVIDIA H100 or A100 GPUs (~800GB VRAM total)
  • 397B parameters, but only 17B active per inference (sparse MoE)

If you don’t have this hardware, skip to the economics section—that’s where the real story is.

2. Install SGLang

SGLang is the recommended inference framework (vLLM also works):

uv pip install 'git+https://github.com/sgl-project/sglang.git#subdirectory=python&egg=sglang[all]'

3. Launch the Server

python -m sglang.launch_server \
  --model-path Qwen/Qwen3.5-397B-A17B \
  --port 8000 \
  --tp-size 8 \
  --mem-fraction-static 0.8 \
  --context-length 262144 \
  --reasoning-parser qwen3

That’s it. You’re running a 397B parameter model with native multimodal support (text, images, video) and a 262K context window.

Critical Gotchas

Thinking mode is ON by default. The model generates step-by-step reasoning in <think> tags before answering. This adds latency but improves accuracy. Disable it if you need speed:

chat_template_kwargs = {"enable_thinking": False}

Don’t go below 128K context. You can reduce the context length to save memory, but dropping below 128K hurts reasoning capabilities. The model was trained with long contexts in mind.

OK, Now Here’s Why This Matters

You got it running. Cool. But here’s the bigger story.

The AI Cost Crisis

Companies are burning cash on AI. OpenAI’s operating costs are astronomical. Anthropic’s Claude is expensive to run. Enterprises are hitting budget limits on inference costs. The math isn’t mathing.

What Alibaba Just Did

According to Alibaba’s benchmarks, they dropped a 397B parameter model that’s:

  • 60% cheaper to operate than its predecessor
  • 8x more efficient at processing large workloads
  • Outperforms their own 1T+ parameter flagship model
  • Apache 2.0 license (fully open, no restrictions)

And they’re giving it away.

Cost Comparison

ModelContext LengthEst. Cost per 1M TokensLicenseHardware
GPT-4 Turbo128K~$10-15 (API)ClosedN/A
Claude 3.5 Sonnet200K~$3-15 (API)ClosedN/A
Qwen 3.5262K-1M~$1-2 (self-hosted, amortized)Apache 2.08× H100/A100

The hardware investment is steep (~$200K+ for 8× H100s), but you own it. No per-token pricing. No rate limits. No vendor lock-in.

For companies doing serious volume, the TCO math flips around 100M tokens per month. After that, self-hosting Qwen 3.5 is cheaper than API calls.

What You Can Now Afford

Long-context applications you couldn’t justify before:

  • Analyze entire codebases (not just files)
  • Process 500-page reports in a single pass
  • Multi-turn conversations that don’t reset context

Multimodal workflows are baked in—text, images, and video run through one model. No more stitching together separate vision and language pipelines or managing multiple API calls.

Agentic systems:

  • Built-in tool calling
  • Thinking mode for complex reasoning chains
  • 201 languages (if you’re building global products)

The 8x efficiency gain means you can run 8x more requests for the same cost. Or the same requests for 1/8th the cost. Your call.

The Strategic Play

Alibaba isn’t trying to compete with OpenAI on closed models. They’re flooding the market with open-weight models that are “good enough” for most use cases and way cheaper to run.

This is the classic open-source playbook: make the baseline free, then charge for enterprise support and cloud hosting. Red Hat did it with Linux. Databricks did it with Spark. Alibaba is doing it with LLMs.

If they succeed, the AI inference market stops being “pay OpenAI or pay Anthropic” and becomes “self-host Qwen or pay for convenience.”

The Reality Check

Before you get too excited: benchmarks aren’t production. Qwen 3.5 might score well on MMLU and GSM8K, but how does it actually perform on your specific use case? The only way to know is to test it.

Also worth noting: Alibaba is a Chinese company, and some enterprises have policies against using Chinese-origin models for compliance or geopolitical reasons. The Apache 2.0 license is clear, but organizational policies might not care.

And don’t forget—self-hosting means you’re now responsible for uptime, scaling, monitoring, and security. API providers handle all of that. The TCO calculation isn’t just hardware costs.

When to Use This vs OpenAI/Anthropic

Use Qwen 3.5 if:

  • You’re doing serious volume (100M+ tokens/month)
  • You need long contexts (262K-1M tokens)
  • You want multimodal in one model
  • You care about data privacy (self-hosted = your infra)
  • You have the hardware or cloud budget for 8× H100s

Stick with APIs if:

  • You’re prototyping or low volume
  • You don’t want to manage infrastructure
  • You need the absolute cutting edge (GPT-5, Claude 4)
  • You don’t have ML ops capacity

The Bottom Line

Qwen 3.5 is production-ready, Apache 2.0 licensed, and 60% cheaper than the competition. It dropped today. You can run it now.

Whether you actually should depends on your volume, your infrastructure, and your tolerance for managing your own LLM deployment.

But the fact that a 397B parameter model with 1M token context support is just available, for free, no strings attached, changes the economics of building AI products.

Your API bill just got a competitor.

Sources: